Fixing EIXGNN parameter bug
This commit is contained in:
parent
edeee1a03e
commit
4c452d1f2a
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ def explainer_conf(explainer: str, **kwargs):
|
||||
)
|
||||
explaining_cfg["domain_similarity"] = kwargs.get("domain_similarity")
|
||||
explaining_cfg["signal_similarity"] = kwargs.get("signal_similarity")
|
||||
explaining_cfg["shap_val_approx"] = kwargs.get("shap_val_approx")
|
||||
explaining_cfg["shapley_value_approx"] = kwargs.get("shapley_value_approx")
|
||||
return explaining_cfg
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ if "__main__" == __name__:
|
||||
importance_sampling_strategy=imp_str,
|
||||
domain_similarity=dom_sim,
|
||||
signal_similarity=sig_sim,
|
||||
shap_val_approx=sh_val,
|
||||
shapley_value_approx=sh_val,
|
||||
L=L,
|
||||
p=p,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user